Exposure to the study of jurisprudence, or the theory and analysis of law in the abstract sense, was well-received in PerakathLand. I welcomed the chance to see that much of philosophy is not as ethereal or irrelevant to daily life as I’d always imagined it to be.
(I also learnt that the way to understand heavy, obtuse philosophical writing is to treat it as a study of an academic subject, like any other, and attack it with pen and notebook and make notes until it makes sense.)
An offshoot of this most trifling exposure to liberal subjects has been some mental development of an ongoing project of mine. An internally consistent theory of life, to make it sound fancy. A way to look at the world, to be simple.
Of course, you can also look at the world by simply opening the window, but I mean an attempt to tame the oft-conflicting viewpoints that come rushing to my head on a given topic, and a way for me to select what viewpoint is most suited for me.
For example, in my response to comments on the post below, I have stated that I do not feel bad about the situation of the poor. This is true, to some degree, or I wouldn’t have said it. However, it’s not universally and omnitemporally true. Every morning I take a break from the library and sit and munch an aloo patty or a bread roll for breakfast. Law Faculty is filled with both human and canine beggar children. The human kids live on a construction site in one corner of the campus, where their parents are daily labourers. The puppies were born in March, towards the end of the academic year. I’ve seen them grow from fat little things that the girls couldn’t stop cooing over into starving packets of legs, ribs, and not much else.
Both these two kinds of beggar-folks come and beg from me every day while I eat. Sometimes the children draw a picture of some shit, colour it, and try and sell it to me for 10 bucks. The dogs gambol at my feet and nip at my toes, and despite myself I quite like them.
But my mind is split in two. One part thinks, “Fuck, man, just get the hell out of my sight, stop bugging me, and let me eat in peace. I don’t care if you’re hungry. Your tough luck that you were born abysmally poor! The grass is always greener, anyway– do I go and beg at Vijay Mallya’s yacht, wishing that I was born super-rich?”
100% truth in that sentence: I do feel that way.
But, you know, I also feel bad for the lowlifes sometimes.
Just not enough to ever give them anything. (I give the dogs some food when there are no kids around.)
So, back to my little theory– when fully developed, I should be able to apply it to a situation such as this, and decide once and for all whether I’m going to be compassionate to the poor, or supremely aloof.
(No, I don’t want there to be a middle ground. That’s not the point of the theory.)
…
This theory, being as it is a creation of my super-intellectual brain, is composed largely of platitudes flicked from books and cinematographic films. (Movies.)
It’s basic tenet, the most fundamental axiom it has, is Gandalf’s words to Frodo at the start of The Fellowship of The Ring, which I seem to remember writing in a post similar to this a few weeks ago, so I’ll skip them now.
Then there are some from the Harry Potter series.
Recently, I’ve added Han’s line from The Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift (what unbelievable driving!1!): That’s life– you make choices and you don’t look back.
…
Anyway, this post isn’t going anywhere fast, and I have to get to the thekas before they close. (No-drinking vow was broken the very next day.) So basically– whatever choice I make, someone other than me turns out to be unhappy. I now need to add something to the theory that explains, or accounts for, or provides a Razor to choose, such choices. Or something that allows me to make choices regardless of other peoples’ happiness. That would be ideal. However, that’s usually viewed as cruelty, and accusations of the same (to varying degrees) do affect my happiness. My current theoretical tool for this situation, Voldemort / Darth Vader’s assertion that: “There is no good or evil; there is only power, and those too afraid to use it,” isn’t proving up to the task. Evidently I’m not the most evil magician who ever lived, nor a highly powerful Sith lord.
Any suggestions on what to watch/read?
Posted by Perakath
Posted by Perakath
Posted by Perakath 
